OptionsBuyer.in · My Daily Journal

Posted in My Daily Journal · 4 October 2026

·

Daily journalPosted by OptionsBuyer ·

A marketplace credit spread, an iron fly, an IV filter — and the day gap-and-go was found

Four tests in one day: a subscription strategy's 87% claim, whether defined-risk wings can shrink a premium-selling book, implied volatility as a sizing signal, and an intraday option-buying lab that produced the first buyer setup with a plateau.

💬 7 questionsresearch notes, not advice
QQuestion 1· asked by the trader

A strategy marketplace sells an expiry-day ratio credit spread claiming 87% success, a 4.2% maximum drawdown and a Sharpe of 3.95. What does eleven years of real option prices say?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

Nine of twelve variants of the 1×2 ratio credit spread were negative or earned under ₹13k over eleven to twelve years. The best — puts, near strike 100 points out, far strike 200 — made +₹73k, +₹195 per expiry day, with 24% green days and 61% losing months. The claim's 23-trade window sits in a 2026 stretch where almost every variant was green. The naked expiry straddle with a 30% stop on the same days made +₹815 per expiry with all years green; the ratio "costume" earns at most a quarter of that with similar or worse tails. The subscription price roughly equalled the best variant's entire annual profit per lot.

·helpful?
QQuestion 2· asked by the trader

Can the expiry-day short straddle be made small-account-friendly by buying protective wings?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

No. The naked straddle with a 30% per-leg stop made +₹774 per expiry over 378 expiries with a ₹14k maximum drawdown. Wings 150, 200 and 300 points away kept 22%, 29% and 46% of that edge and made the drawdown worse (₹66k, ₹46k, ₹30k). The per-leg stop already does the wings' job; the wing premium is pure drag on a stop-managed book, and it turns choppy months red. The wings' real value — insurance against a gap through the stop — is invisible to a clean-fill backtest, while their cost is visible and certain.

·helpful?
QQuestion 3· asked by the trader

Does implied volatility tell you when to sell premium?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

It tells you how much, not whether. Using the opening straddle as a percentage of spot as the IV proxy, the expiry straddle's profit rose monotonically across terciles: ₹513, ₹621 and ₹1,191 per expiry. A tradeable rule — above the trailing 20-day median — earned ₹1,086 per expiry versus ₹530 below it. The low-IV days still earned money with better worst days, so skipping them would have cost ₹1.06L. The right use is a sizing signal: one lot always, a second on fat mornings.

·helpful?
QQuestion 4· asked by the trader

You then set out to find an intraday option-buying setup. Most buying tests fail — what was different?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

Pre-registration and a plateau. Five families were tested on 2,772 days of minute data: leg momentum, opening-range breakouts, expiry-afternoon gamma, narrow-range long straddles and 13:30 trend continuation. Buying both ATM legs at 9:20 every day — the baseline toll — lost ₹3.51L. My pre-registered favourite, expiry-afternoon gamma, lost. The one family with life was the opening-range breakout, and dissecting it found three mechanisms: deep in-the-money strikes beat ATM (less theta, futures-like), days with a gap of at least 0.5% paid while small-gap days lost, and a breakout aligned with the gap paid while one against it lost. Put together: gap-and-go.

·helpful?
QQuestion 5· asked by the trader

What is the gap-and-go rule, and why call it a plateau?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

Gap of at least 0.5% versus the previous 15:15 close; opening range 9:15–9:45; first one-minute close beyond the range by 10% of its width, in the gap's direction, before 14:30; buy the option 100–150 points in the money on that side; stop at −30% of premium; trail 20% from the peak once up 5%; otherwise exit at 15:15. Twelve years: 329 trades, +₹2.18L, +₹662 per trade, 46% winners, maximum drawdown ₹32k, profit-to-drawdown 6.7, positive in 10 of 12 years. All sixteen depth-and-trail cells were positive, every gap threshold from 0.3% to 0.8% was positive, every opening-range length was positive — a plateau, not a peak. Parameters chosen on 2015–20 earned +₹1.47L out of sample on 2021–26, and the reverse also held.

·helpful?
QQuestion 6· asked by the trader

What were the warning signs you wrote down the same night?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

Three. 2025 and 2026 were negative (−₹20k and −₹12k on 46 trades — regime or decay, unknowable at that sample); conditions were chosen in-sample across roughly 150 cells, which walk-forward mitigates but does not erase; and 27 trades a year is thin. An independent audit also checked the fill convention — entering one minute after the signal and doubling the spread — and the deeper strike was insensitive to both. Candidate, not edge: it went to a paper bot with a 30-trade gate before any talk of real money.

·helpful?
QQuestion 7· asked by the trader

Does the same rule work on BankNifty?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

It passed harder. Same rule, 2018 to November 2024: every depth cell positive, 7 of 7 years on most, +₹521 per trade at the 300-point depth with profit-to-drawdown 9.2. A control with the breakout against the gap made almost nothing on more trades, so alignment is the edge on a second index. Two caveats recorded: BankNifty's edge decays with execution lag (about 15% per minute, unlike NIFTY), and the data predates the move to monthly-only expiries, so the planning number was cut to ₹414 per trade pending live slippage.

·helpful?
← 29 September 20266 October 2026 →