OptionsBuyer.in · My Daily Journal

Posted in My Daily Journal · 24 October 2026

·

Daily journalPosted by OptionsBuyer ·

Ten lots or five, no month to skip, no festival to fear, and the one condition that loses

The lot-size debate ends in fixed five lots with an anniversary rule, standing down after a huge month and month cards are both rejected ten to nothing, festivals and budgets turn out to be gap effects, a 330,000-condition hunt for "80% moments" finds nothing on the profit side and one stretched-market loser on the loss side, reversing it is tested, and stock gap trading is dropped.

💬 7 questionsresearch notes, not advice
QQuestion 1· asked by the trader

Ten lots or five?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

The edge per lot per trade was ₹633 in 2015–22 and ₹140 in 2023–26, a step rather than a drift (p 0.019), so sizing from the long-run average would size from a market that may no longer exist. Every debater and the judge landed on fixed five lots with an anniversary rule: step up to ten only after twelve months in which no top-up was needed and measured costs stayed at or under 0.3% per side. Ramps gated on recent profit were tested and whipsaw — they add lots at the top and cut them at the bottom.

·helpful?
QQuestion 2· asked by the trader

After a huge month, should the book stand down?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

Rejected ten to nothing, 0 of 36 cells. After a top-decile month the next month averaged +₹86k against +₹48k otherwise — momentum, not mean reversion, because the size of gaps is autocorrelated (0.47) and the book earns on gaps. Month cards, a fixed allocation by calendar month, were rejected ten to nothing as well: movement explains the months (wild-gap months +₹92k against +₹16k for calm ones), the pattern breaks in 2023–26, and drawdown is independent of the month.

·helpful?
QQuestion 3· asked by the trader

Festivals, budget day, elections — avoid them or size up?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

Neither. Post-holiday days look good only because holidays pile up news: 44% of them gap 0.5% or more against 25% normally, and once the gap is controlled for the holiday effect is ₹2.9k with p 0.27. Budget day lost 5 of 6 trades; exit-poll and result days earned ₹33.9k and ₹27.6k, but on two trades each. Thirteen event tests, none survives correction, no live change.

·helpful?
QQuestion 4· asked by the trader

Is there any moment where the odds are 80% or better?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

On the profit side, no. A pre-registered bar — at least 25 traded days, win rate at or above 80% or at or below 20%, confidence interval clear of 60/40, both halves of history agreeing, surviving an extra 0.2% per side of cost and a label-shuffle null — was applied to roughly 330,000 pre-entry conditions, including 39 pieces of desk folklore about gap fills, expiry day, Mondays and Fridays, budget, RBI, VIX and the first 30 minutes. No single feature moves the win rate outside 34–62% from a base of 45%. The chain's money is bigger wins on big-gap days — gaps of 0.75% or more pay about three times the average per trade — not more frequent wins, and gaps under 0.25% have been break-even since 2023.

·helpful?
QQuestion 5· asked by the trader

And on the loss side?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

One condition, found independently by three reviewers and confirmed by hand: the door on a 0.2–0.5% gap when the prior close is at least 2.5% above its 20-day average. 67 trades since 2015, 13% winners, about −₹7.2k per trade at five lots; 27% winners in 2015–20 and 1 of 31 since 2021, and out of sample on 2023–26, with the rule frozen on data to 2022, 25 trades at 20%. It is not fragile to the threshold (2.0–3.5% gives 13–26%), and the mirror image — stretched below — is normal at 47–52%, so the rule stays one-sided. Skipping it would have taken the chain from ₹33.4 lakh to ₹38.3 lakh and the drawdown from ₹2.42 lakh to ₹2.02 lakh. Because a search this large produces about 50 such "passes" by chance, it is a candidate skip rule to be paper-logged, not adopted today.

·helpful?
QQuestion 6· asked by the trader

If the door loses there, should it go the other way?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

Reversing — buying the opposite option at the same minute with the same stop and trail — turns 61 trades at 15% winners and −₹4.41 lakh into 49% winners and +₹4.83 lakh. But almost all of that came in 2019–22; in 2023–26 the reverse is roughly break-even (+₹24k on 16 trades), so nearly all the benefit comes from not taking the losing trade. A reverse is a second data-mined bet stacked on the first; if anything is adopted it is the skip.

·helpful?
QQuestion 7· asked by the trader

Does stock data help the index chain, or trade on its own?

AOptionsBuyer· answer from the data

Three tests, ten reviewers, and the stock data earns its keep only as a caution. As a filter on the index chain, breadth, heavyweight confirmation and sector models all failed — heavyweight "confirmation" would have cut the door's best days, which are the ones where the heavyweights gap against the index, and the one breadth result that looked good was an artefact of the stock universe growing from 48 to 117 names in September 2024. Trading the stocks themselves, gap-and-go lost ₹715–787 per trade net and gap fades about ₹1,000–1,200; stocks do give gaps back, but before any signal fires, and only 0–10 basis points remain against a 0.9% option round trip. A low sector-dispersion condition at entry reproduces in both halves of history and goes on the paper log. Stock gap trading is dropped; the cheap, liquid index chain stays the edge.

·helpful?
← 23 October 202626 October 2026 →